Whose Duff Is It Anyway?
Stacy Keibler - now a bonafide actress and no longer simply sports entertainment eye-candy slash part-time model of sorts - has been making the news lately. You will see her name trending and for a variety of reasons too: first and foremost it is for her participation, as a genuine thespian, in George Clooney's film about corruption in the U.S. electoral process (at least, that is what that movie should have been about...!) Secondly, it is due to her relationship with Clooney, or rumored relationship... And thirdly, it is because of, well... because of her butt. Again.
Some things never change, eh?
As E! expert Marc Malkin said so eloquently - I merely paraphrase here - "care to see what only Clooney is seeing *live* and in the flesh, these days?" Emphasis on the "these days" there because, contrary to her habits (and job requirements, let's be frank) during the good old WCW/WWE days, she is not flaunting her rear assets anywhere else nowadays, not even on her very own WhoSay hearsay cyber-stuff...! Hence it is up to, first and foremost, filmmakers like George Clooney, artsy-photogs like Raphael Mazzucco and, of course, "experts2 such as Malkin there to expose those gems once again for the benefit of the public at large...
So here is the incriminating evidence:
All Rights Reserved
The question is - is this truly Keibler at all? We can compare the... er... culo, y`know!
The question can legitimately be asked here, especially in the light of that rather timid sharing on her WhoSay back there...! After all, Keibler has never been so shy, as evidently displayed before:
All Rights Reserved
As often seen on sites such as celebful, you can really get an eyeful with these starlets, quite on a regular basis, all throughout their career on various stages, platforms, media...
So the reason for this latest bout with languishing is clearly not of the order of "oh, no - why did she expose herself like this, degrade herself like this, she's such a nice girl under normal circumstances, blah-blah-blah..." - nope.
Rather, the observer here wonders why in blue blazes did Mazzucco have the culot to display her culo that has been amply seen by one and all over the years in such an obfuscating, disguised way - obviously?
For all one has to do is run a quick search for Stacy Keibler wallpaper images - and the results start pouring in in great abundance - even "greater" shots than the one above that clearly demonstrate that the culo so artistically veiled by Mazzucco most certainly is that of Keibler - painted if not photographed as Malkin and other wagged tongues have been stating.
The only answer here is that Raphael made use of artistic license and just repackaged the assets in question in a way most befitting of his acceptable (in every sense of the word) vision d'artiste...!
Still...
Who really would want to cough up cash in order to see buttocks like these - like this? Who in their right mind gives so much importance to a butt? Who cares about the derrière? And who (else) would bother showing their butt - for art?
The whole languishing whether there is artistic merit or not is dangerously rearing its ugly head here...! (And what was the butt of the joke of a song, way back when, again? Something about a face being like someone's behind? But that is another story now...)
We've heard the question once, we've heard it a million times: "is it art?"
Anything and everything seems to be, these days...
Anything and everything can qualify...!
As for the question of modeling for this - it takes no effort at all, really. Ask one who is used to it, like Stacy Keibler...
And when it comes to our original question, earlier - well, there should be no doubt here, at all, really: the butt is hers, artistic obfuscation or not.
I mean - man, some of those shots simply make it crystal clear, don't they?
!!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home