Ughhh

  Foul Mouths and Forked Tongues 

will say otherwise... 

But *I* say these were actually GOOD: 

The cast nailed it 

The script was witty - cohesively setting up the series 

And the special effects were decent  - for a farce 

 

Smiling, Thus Far, Eh?

Smile...

...languish later! 

1984

 So... We're hearing that Patty & Gal 

didn't do so well in their redux...? 

*WW84* isn't all that it 

could have been/promised to be? 

Maybe it is due to it 

having only ONE song from 1984 

in its entire soundtrack - and it is this: 

 

WOW. 

That was... underwhelming! 

(In spite of the daring bits there, 

for its day and prudish age; 

such as the protruding ones 

seen in this shot, screenshot 

for your convenience 

(since fickle YouTube might 

take it down any second now!)

 

...boobies? (Even if only side boob shots) in a MUSIC VIDEO from the Eighties?!? 

And all staged in the midst of some kind of sado-maso lesbo scene...?!? 

How did this get past the censors, back then? 

How did it get uploaded to YT... NOW? 

#ButThatIsAnotherStory

No, really... 

PATTY should have gone 

WITH THIS SONG INSTEAD: 

It tells the same basic tale as her film 

(heck - even features a lookalike 

of Chris Whatsisname; Steeeeve!!!) 

it's from the repertoire of a far more 

legendary band (the Moody Blues) 

and it represents the spirit of the 80s 

far better... IMHLO 

(In My Humble Luminous Opinion!) 

WHO CARES IF IT CAME OUT 

EXACTLY IN 1984 OR NOT!? 

What's more important here: 

historical accuracy in a fictitious work 

or artistic integrity and LOGIC!? 

Never mind - yeah...!

AND ANOTHER SONG THAT 

SHOULD HAVE BEEN USED... 

...yeah, okay - make it the original version!

... for BOTH "Diana Prince" 

and "Barbara Minerva" need an answer 

to that most anguishing question!  

FAST!!!

... and Steve... and Patty too! 

I mean... what was that... 

NO EURYTHMICS?!? 

Inert Bogus Times...

Will hashtags #WhatHisLastMovie 

and #IfItOnlyHadBeen  

go viral... ever? 

Most likely not.

Will the most active people on social media 

ever make an effort to become more...

articulate?...logical? ...SMART?

Not holding my breath for that.

Does Robin give a damn now, 

where he is?

(Wherever it may come to be - 

what it may come to be - 

or something like that?)

But, really now...

Even my CAT can make more intelligent use 

of social media...

especially when it comes time to 

express bereavement...

It's not about movie lines that he might have delivered, 

worthy of being remembered... 

'lest you forgot''... twits. 

The most important -as most interesting- thing 

to look for at a time like this, 

in the man's body of work, 

has to be any and all signs 

he might have given 

about his predicament... 

The lines chosen by the fans do not even begin 

to deliver, on that all-important front; 

heck, in fact, now as when he was leaving this world, 

those lines do not mean jack squat 

for Robin himself...

The mere fact he chose that role 

in that final finished film at the time of his departure, 

a film bastardized by the American remake process 

but totally fitting ; it is much telling 

about his state of mind,  

about his spirits...

The final role of an actor, as cherished as Robin was,  

will always be remembered as the last message, 

most heartfelt, that he had to deliver to his fans. 

That travesty of a remake, 

badly written and directed though it was, 

contains vital clues to its star's state of mind 

(confirmed by a candid confession 

concerning depression, made during an interview - 

and still, Robin did not get the help 

he was in dire need of...)

Robin Williams was unique -

a comic with that tragic aura; 

and we find out too late 

that it was no act... 

Aye, we shall never forget.

You got that right, Zulika...

+++

When's That Comeback Again...?

Yeah, okay - don't wanna beat a dead horse here 

or anything like that - however... 

THE LANGUISHING QUESTION KEEPS HAUNTING 

MANY A SOUL OUT THERE... 

(well, maybe just one or two fans, tops...?) 

REGARDING ALL OF THE FOLLOWING 

- AND MANY, MANY MORE, OUT THERE... 

WHEN WILL THEY MAKE A COMEBACK? 

HUH? 

... the answer, my friends, is blowing in the wind; 

the answer is blowing in the wind! 

*  meaning: never more 

Whose Duff Is It Anyway?

Stacy Keibler - now a bonafide actress and no longer simply sports entertainment eye-candy slash part-time model of sorts - has been making the news lately. You will see her name trending and for a variety of reasons too: first and foremost it is for her participation, as a genuine thespian, in George Clooney's film about corruption in the U.S. electoral process (at least, that is what that movie should have been about...!) Secondly, it is due to her relationship with Clooney, or rumored relationship... And thirdly, it is because of, well... because of her butt. Again.

Some things never change, eh?

As E! expert Marc Malkin said so eloquently - I merely paraphrase here - "care to see what only Clooney is seeing *live* and in the flesh, these days?" Emphasis on the "these days" there because, contrary to her habits (and job requirements, let's be frank) during the good old WCW/WWE days, she is not flaunting her rear assets anywhere else nowadays, not even on her very own WhoSay hearsay cyber-stuff...! Hence it is up to, first and foremost, filmmakers like George Clooney, artsy-photogs like Raphael Mazzucco and, of course, "experts2 such as Malkin there to expose those gems once again for the benefit of the public at large...

As if one could live without exposure to some celeb buttocks on a regular basis...?

The obsessive languishing in this case stems from the fact that we cannot be 100% sure that those are indeed her buttocks there... Further analysis is definitely required here - and, though it is a dirty job, someone has got to do it - thus, I volunteered...

So here is the incriminating evidence:



Culo by Raphael Mazzucco -
All Rights Reserved

The question is - is this truly Keibler at all? We can compare the... er... culo, y`know!

The question can legitimately be asked here, especially in the light of that rather timid sharing on her WhoSay back there...! After all, Keibler has never been so shy, as evidently displayed before:


Stacy Keibler wallpaper -
All Rights Reserved



As often seen on sites such as celebful, you can really get an eyeful with these starlets, quite on a regular basis, all throughout their career on various stages, platforms, media...

So the reason for this latest bout with languishing is clearly not of the order of "oh, no - why did she expose herself like this, degrade herself like this, she's such a nice girl under normal circumstances, blah-blah-blah..." - nope.

Rather, the observer here wonders why in blue blazes did Mazzucco have the culot to display her culo that has been amply seen by one and all over the years in such an obfuscating, disguised way - obviously?

For all one has to do is run a quick search for Stacy Keibler wallpaper images - and the results start pouring in in great abundance - even "greater" shots than the one above that clearly demonstrate that the culo so artistically veiled by Mazzucco most certainly is that of Keibler - painted if not photographed as Malkin and other wagged tongues have been stating.

The only answer here is that Raphael made use of artistic license and just repackaged the assets in question in a way most befitting of his acceptable (in every sense of the word) vision d'artiste...!

Still...
Who really would want to cough up cash in order to see buttocks like these - like this? Who in their right mind gives so much importance to a butt? Who cares about the derrière? And who (else) would bother showing their butt - for art?

The whole languishing whether there is artistic merit or not is dangerously rearing its ugly head here...! (And what was the butt of the joke of a song, way back when, again? Something about a face being like someone's behind? But that is another story now...)

We've heard the question once, we've heard it a million times: "is it art?"

Anything and everything seems to be, these days...
Anything and everything can qualify...!

As for the question of modeling for this - it takes no effort at all, really. Ask one who is used to it, like Stacy Keibler...

And when it comes to our original question, earlier - well, there should be no doubt here, at all, really: the butt is hers, artistic obfuscation or not.

I mean - man, some of those shots simply make it crystal clear, don't they?

!!